Database › State of AI in engineering
State of AI in engineering
What the companies in this database have publicly said about AI in their engineering orgs, boiled down into six patterns. Everything below is pulled from the same sourced records as the company pages, and it is regenerated every time the data is rebuilt, so counts and examples change as companies publish new figures. Each point links to the company page and to the dated source behind it.
1. AI now writes most of the code at the leaders
20 of 53 companies have published a share-of-code or AI-authored-code figure (full list). The highest current figures:
- Anthropic: As of May 2026, more than 80% of code merged into Anthropic's codebase was attributed to Claude, up from low single digits before February 2025. Leadership estimates 90%+ including scripts. vendor-reported (Anthropic Institute, 2026-06-04)
- Coinbase: In July 2026 Coinbase's Rob Witoff said 95-100% of code is written by or with LLMs, up from about 40% in February, and that effectively every employee uses AI daily. Most engineers run 5-10 agents. (Cointelegraph, 2026-07-14)
- Google (Alphabet): Pichai said in April 2026 that 75% of all new code at Google is AI-generated and approved by engineers, up from 50% the previous fall. (Google, 2026-04-22)
- Airbnb: Brian Chesky said on the Q1 2026 call that nearly 60% of the code Airbnb engineers produce is now written by AI, which he estimated at about twice the industry average. (TechCrunch, 2026-05-08; Motley Fool, 2026-05-07)
- Shopify: President Harley Finkelstein said on the Q1 2026 call that AI writes 'well over 50%' of Shopify's code and that the share is rising. (Motley Fool, 2026-05-05)
- Mercado Libre: On the Q2 2026 call management said 20,000 developers use AI and that 'human written code is the exception'; the majority of code is now written by AI. (Motley Fool, 2026-08-12)
- Ramp: Inspect wrote about 30% of merged PRs to Ramp's frontend and backend repos as of January 2026. It wrote about 70% of all merged PRs by late April 2026. (Ramp Builders, 2026-01-12; Zach Bruggeman on LinkedIn, 2026-04-30)
2. Few companies formally mandate it
Of 53 companies, 6 have a reported mandate (Coinbase, Intercom, Microsoft, Nvidia, Shopify, Zapier), 1 explicitly says use is not forced (Ramp), and 46 are unclear or not reported. Most encourage use and track adoption instead (mandate list).
- Duolingo: Von Ahn's April 2025 'AI-first' memo made AI use part of hiring and performance reviews. In April 2026 he said Duolingo had backtracked on the review metric: 'if it can't [help], I'm not going to force you to do that.' The policy changed, so the mandate is now unclear. (The Verge, 2025-04-28; Business Insider, 2025-04-29; Duolingo on LinkedIn, 2025-04-28; Fortune, 2026-04-13)
- Nvidia: Cursor's February 2026 case study says Nvidia 'set a new engineering mandate' to use Cursor to embed AI across every phase of the SDLC. Jensen Huang has said 100% of engineers use Cursor and pitched token budgets worth about half an engineer's salary. (Business Insider, 2025-10-15; Cursor customer story, 2026-02-06; CNBC, 2026-03-20)
- Amazon: A November 2025 internal memo made Kiro Amazon's recommended AI development tool and said Amazon does not plan to support additional third-party AI development tools. That is a tool-standardization policy, not a reported usage mandate. In 2026 Stores engineering set AI-native targets for teams, but a spokesperson said Amazon does not 'centrally mandate that teams use AI tools'. (Reuters via CNA, 2025-11-25; Reuters (original; may be paywalled or b, 2025-11-25; Business Insider, 2026-04-27)
- Meta: Meta announced 'AI-driven impact' as a core performance expectation starting in 2026. By September 2026 it had reportedly stepped back, saying it would not use AI adoption dashboards or token counts to evaluate impact. (Business Insider, 2025-11-14; WIRED, 2026-09-02)
- Ramp: Ramp says it did not force anyone to use its in-house agent, Inspect, and that adoption was driven by building to people's needs and by visible use in shared spaces. (Ramp Builders, 2026-01-12)
- Shopify: Shopify tracks code reversion rate, which it says has stayed roughly flat as AI use grew, and alerts on anyone spending more than $250 a day in tokens through its LLM proxy. (BVP Atlas, 2026-04-02)
- Nvidia: Huang proposed giving engineers AI tokens worth about half their base pay on top of salary, because 'every engineer that has access to tokens will be more productive'. (CNBC, 2026-03-20)
Duolingo is counted as unclear because it walked back its performance-review requirement. Nvidia's "mandate" wording comes from a case study by Cursor, the vendor that sells the tool.
3. Review is the bottleneck, and the main guardrail
20 of 53 companies describe code review as part of how they control AI-written code. The common pattern is a required human reviewer, often with an AI reviewer first.
- Anthropic: Anthropic says human code review has become a bottleneck as code volume grows. vendor-reported (Anthropic Institute, 2026-06-04)
- Anthropic: Every proposed change is read by an automated Claude reviewer before merge. A retrospective found it would have caught about a third of the bugs behind past claude.ai incidents. vendor-reported (Anthropic Institute, 2026-06-04)
- Shopify: All AI requests route through an internal LLM proxy. A senior human reviewer is required on PRs, and AI cannot check in code automatically. (BVP Atlas, 2026-04-02)
- Amazon: After retail outages, including one tied to Amazon Q, a 90-day policy for about 335 Tier-1 systems requires two-person review, documented approval through Modeled Change Management, and automated reliability checks. Amazon said only one reviewed incident was AI-related. (Business Insider, 2026-03-10)
- Uber: Code review changed: an AI reviewer now runs on every commit in CI across all six of Uber's monorepos, in addition to human review. (Uber Engineering, 2025-08-12)
- Intercom: Code review changed: 19% of merged PRs are now auto-approved by AI with no human review. (Darragh Curran (Intercom CTO) on LinkedIn, 2026-04-16)
- Ramp: Each session runs in a sandboxed VM. PRs are opened with the user's own GitHub token so that people cannot approve their own agent-written changes. (Ramp Builders, 2026-01-12)
- Canva: Humphreys said senior engineers now describe their jobs as 'largely review': writing detailed instructions for agents that run in the background, sometimes overnight. (Business Insider, 2026-02-15)
4. Coding agents are replacing autocomplete
Companies increasingly publish internal agent platforms that open pull requests on their own, rather than editor autocomplete.
- Shopify: In a 30-day window, River ran 59,918 sessions in 5,170 Slack channels and co-authored 3,536 merged pull requests (about one in eight merged PRs). (Shopify Engineering, 2026-05-28)
- Uber: CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga said in March 2026 that 95% of engineers use AI monthly, and that Uber's internal agent writes about 1,800 code changes a week entirely, up from under 1% to 8% of all changes. (Business Insider, 2026-03-18)
- Dropbox: Nova accounts for roughly 1 in 12 pull requests at Dropbox (May 2026). It handles flaky-test fixes validated with 100+ CI runs, migrations and dependency upgrades. (Dropbox.tech, 2026-05-21; Dropbox.tech, 2026-05-28)
- Canva: Canva says nine in ten employees use AI every week. Forge, an internal tool for managing parallel AI agents, has 475 monthly active users and is now supported DevX tooling. (Canva Newsroom, 2026-05-19)
- Stripe: Stripe says more than 1,000 pull requests merged each week are entirely produced by Minions and reviewed by humans. (Stripe Dev Blog, 2026-02-09)
- Spotify: Spotify says the background agent has merged 1,500+ PRs, and that Fleet Management has automated roughly half of its PRs since mid-2024. (Spotify Engineering, 2025-11)
Most common named tools across the database (number of companies): Claude Code (16), Cursor (12), GitHub Copilot (9), Claude (4), Codex (4). Tool lists are on each company page.
5. Org shape is changing
Flatter orgs, fewer pure managers, and less junior hiring show up alongside the AI push. Companies rarely attribute cuts to AI alone, so read the sources.
- Coinbase: The May 2026 restructuring cut about 14% of staff, capped the org at five layers below the CEO/COO, removed pure-manager roles and introduced AI-native pods, including one-person teams. (Coinbase blog, 2026-05-05)
- Airbnb: Chesky said there is no room for 'pure people managers'. Many design and engineering managers are going back to coding or using Claude Code. (Business Insider, 2026-05-08; Motley Fool, 2026-05-07)
- Coinbase: Cointelegraph reported that junior developer roles were among those affected by the layoffs. (Cointelegraph, 2026-07-14)
- Anthropic: Business Insider reported that an Anthropic report from October 2026 said it has hired for a smaller share of junior technical positions as agents took on more work. (Business Insider, 2026-10-22)
- Uber: Uber said in May 2026 that it is slowing hiring to fund AI investment. The CTO said it had already spent its 2026 Claude Code budget. (Business Insider, 2026-05-06)
- Salesforce: In January 2026 Benioff said he had held engineering headcount (about 15,000) mostly flat because of AI productivity, while hiring 20% more account executives. (ITPro, 2026-01-15)
6. Caveat: most results are self-reported
Of 105 current numeric metric and result claims in the database, 44 rest only on the company's own words (blog, memo or executive post), 21 rest only on vendor-written sources, and 40 cite press coverage, which itself usually relays company statements, such as earnings calls. Across all 151 sources: 20 primary, 38 company, 76 press, 17 vendor. Companies with at least one vendor-written source: Anthropic, Atlassian, Box, Datadog, GitHub, IBM, Mercado Libre, Netflix, Nvidia, OpenAI, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Tencent, Twilio.
Vendor-reported figures, one per company:
- Anthropic: Respondents self-reported using Claude in 59% of their work, for a +50% productivity gain. Anthropic saw a 67% increase in merged PRs per engineer per day after adopting Claude Code. vendor-reported (Anthropic, 2025-12-02)
- Atlassian: Atlassian reports a 30.8% reduction in median PR cycle time and 35.6% fewer human review comments across 1,900+ repos. vendor-reported (Atlassian, 2026-04-07)
- Box: Per Cursor's case study, 800+ developers (85% of engineering) use Cursor daily, Levie estimates a 30-50% roadmap throughput increase, and React and design-system migrations finished 80-90% faster than expected. vendor-reported (Cursor customer story, 2026-02-13)
- Datadog: Codex reviews every PR in one major repository, used by more than 1,000 engineers, according to OpenAI. vendor-reported (OpenAI, 2026-01-09)
- IBM: The Instana team reports a 70% gain (about 10 hours a week per developer), and the Maximo team 69%. vendor-reported (IBM Newsroom, 2026-04-28)
- Netflix: Netflix engineers became 20-30% more efficient with AI coding agents, and up to 65% on some tasks, according to JetBrains. vendor-reported (JetBrains, 2026-10-01)
- Nvidia: Per Cursor, 30,000+ Nvidia developers use Cursor daily and commit three times more code, with bug rates flat. vendor-reported (Cursor customer story, 2026-02-06)
- OpenAI: The heaviest (99th-percentile) users run more than 60 hours of agent turns per day across parallel agents. vendor-reported (OpenAI, 2026-06-25)
- Salesforce: Per Cursor, over 75% of Salesforce developers use Cursor, PR velocity rose 30%+, and one team cut legacy test-coverage time by 85%. vendor-reported (Cursor customer story, 2026-01-21)
- ServiceNow: Sales preparation time fell by up to 95% in early results (a non-engineering use). vendor-reported (ServiceNow Newsroom, 2026-01-28)
- Tencent: Coding time has been cut by more than 40%, Tencent says. vendor-reported (PR Newswire, 2026-01-21)
- Twilio: A product manager built more than 1,000 commits in 90 days with Claude Code, including 425 MCP tools, according to Anthropic. vendor-reported (Claude customer story, 2026-01-01)
Treat any single number as a claim, not a benchmark. Methodology: how sources are typed, dated and verified.